Resource Type: Social Science Research
-
For Members
Gendered Impressions of Issue Publics as Predictors of Climate Activism
December 3, 2018
Playing up the masculine character of the climate movement may attract more supporters. Describing the climate moThis study investigated some factors that might predict interest in engaging in climate activism. The study—using surveys—found that people who perceive that the pro-climate “issue public” (i.e., people who care most about climate change) has “positive masculine” traits are MORE likely to say they’re interested in engaging in climate activism. In contrast, the study found that people were NOT more likely to be interested in climate activism when they thought that the pro-climate issue public has “positive feminine” traits. Perceiving “negative masculine” traits associated with pro-climate issue publics was correlated with people being more interested in ANTI-climate activism.
-
For Members
Webinar: Researcher-Advocate Collaborations Peer Learning Exchange
December 3, 2018
-
For Members
Three briefs on Researcher-Advocate collaborations
November 29, 2018
-
For Members
Research Impact Through Matchmaking (RITM): How and Why to Connect Researchers and Practitioners
November 29, 2018
-
For Members
How Policymakers Evaluate Online versus Offline Constituent Messages
November 27, 2018
-
For Members
Fearful Conservatives, Angry Liberals: Information Processing Related to the 2016 Presidential Election and Climate Change
November 26, 2018
-
For Members
Attribution matters: Revisiting the link between extreme weather experience and climate change mitigation responses
November 22, 2018
-
For Members
Lab 101 | Leveraging Data to Increase your Engagement Impact
November 14, 2018
-
For Members
Dynamics of Climate Change Belief in Rural and Wind Turbine Communities
November 14, 2018
-
For Members
Legislative Staff and Representation in Congress
October 30, 2018
Senior Congressional aides consistently do not accurately identify their district or state’s policy preferences on issues (ranging from regulating carbon emissions to gun control to health care) and often overestimate their constituents’ conservatism. Across all five issues, this research finds that staffers do not accurately identify their district or state’s preferences and often overestimate their constituents’ conservatism. For example, 78% of staffers underestimated constituent support for carbon limits in their districts and states.
-
For Members
Diverse segments of the US public underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans
October 29, 2018
-
For Members
Global Climate Justice Activism: “The New Protagonists” and their Projects for a Just Transition
October 14, 2018