Issue: Solar
-
For Members
POLL: Voters of Faith Support Fighting Climate Change
October 21, 2020
From a nationally representative poll of registered voters fielded on Oct. 13, 2020, three-quarters (73%) of voters say they are worried about climate change, including 87% of Black Protestants, 82% of nonwhite Catholics, 77% of white Catholics, 76% of Jews, and 57% of white evangelical Protestants. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of voters want a multi-trillion-dollar federal economic stimulus to invest in clean energy infrastructure as part of COVID-19 recovery, including 72% of Black Protestants and 54% of white evangelical Protestants.
-
Poll: NC voter support for clean energy policies ticks down but stays strong
September 28, 2020
79% of voters are more likely to support a lawmaker who supports policies that encourage renewabl energy options (such as wind, solar, and waste to energy technologies), compared to 51% of voters who are more likely to support a lawmaker who supports policies that encourage the development of more fossil fuel energy, such as coal and oil.
Voters are most likely (85%) to support a lawmaker who supports legislation that would provide additional ways for home or business owners to finance energy upgrades, such as improved insulation, lighting, or windows.
77% of voters are more likely to support a lawmaker who wants to change North Carolina’s regulatory policy to allow for more competition and consumer choice.
A pluarility of voters (38%) see climate change as a “serious problem” and think “immediate action” is necessary. An addiitonal 22% support “some action.”
60% of voters recognize that the effects of climate change “have already begun to happen” and 59% understand climate change is “mainly the result of manmade pollution.” -
For Members
Poll: Coronavirus, Racial Justice, and Climate Policy
September 23, 2020
A national survey conducted in late August found that:
The coronavirus pandemic has created the urgency to act in a way that climate change hasn’t.
Despite the fact that voters are less concerned about climate, they still want robust clean energy investments in economic stimulus, seeing that as a great way to create jobs and better than investing in fossil fuels.
Because the urgency to act is already high and voters strongly and broadly support clean energy stimulus, we can still win.
Communications should focus on the need to recover economically from the coronavirus pandemic and the ways clean energy investments can create jobs and growth.
Environmental justice messages should be a part of this: They connect powerfully with communities of color, and there is no apparent backlash effect with white audiences. -
For Members
Poll: What Massachusetts Voters are Saying About Clean Energy
September 14, 2020
-
For Members
Memo: Voters Want to Cancel Fossil Fuels
September 1, 2020
-
For Members
Energy infrastructure, NIMBYism, and public opinion: a systematic literature review of three decades of empirical survey literature
August 24, 2020
-
Pathway to Prosperity: Lessons learned from developing and implementing a low-income solar program in Washington, D.C.
August 23, 2020
Solar United Neighbors designed and implemented a low- and moderate-income solar program that empowers D.C. residents to benefit from rooftop and commmunity solar. Lessons learned from the work necessary to build and run an effective program include: Start small, then scale up; Build trust in the community; Leverage key partnerships; Expand customer base through referrals; Work to simplify the process; and Be flexible and creative in the communications process.
-
For Members
D.N.C. Climate Council on Environment and the Climate Crisis
August 17, 2020
-
For Members
Paying attention to climate change: Positive images of climate change solutions capture attention
July 31, 2020
Use emotionally positive images of climate change solutions to grab people’s attention. Using experiments with undergraduate students that measure individuals’ reaction time, researchers found that positive images of climate change, like windmills and solar panels, were better at grabbing participants’ attention than negative images of causes (smokestacks, air pollution) and effects (glaciers melting) of climate change. In fact, using negative images of climate change was no more attention grabbing than images irrelevant to climate change. The use of positive images may be even more important for grabbing the attention of those who are least disposed to care about the environment and climate change. So, when developing media and communication information, consider using positive images of climate change solutions.
-
For Members
Energy policy and public opinion: patterns, trends and future directions
July 27, 2020