If you’re logging in to the new site for the first time, you need to reset your password.

Resource Center

Explore our Resources

Access comprehensive resources, toolkits, and research to strengthen your climate advocacy work. Save resources, organize with personal tags, and share curated collections with your team.

Member Content

This content is exclusive to Climate Advocacy Lab members. Please log in or become a member to access.

  • In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    Fresh data from the tracking poll!

    Results from the latest run of our Climate & Clean Energy Tracking Poll are out! The survey of 2,662 (self-reported) registered voters in Colorado, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Ohio found concern about climate around all-time highs, polarization of confidence in federal climate action, and remarkably steady Republican attitudes. Check out the deck*, or watch the webinar recording*.
    This wave of the Tracking Poll was fielded from July 30-Aug. 2, 2018 in cooperation with the Climate and Clean Energy Polling Consortium (CCEPC) and Climate Nexus; it is the latest in the semi-annual surveys going back to November 2014. The goal has been to monitor shifts in beliefs and attitudes over time across five key states where the climate advocacy community is focusing substantial public engagement work.

  • In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    Eight Grassroots Strategies for Engaging with Congress

  • In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    Collaborating for Bold Possibilities: The Ecosystem of Networks Advancing a Just Energy Transition

  • In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    What we've learned about engaging rural communities

    In 2016, Donald Trump received 62% of the “rural vote” (more than any other recent Republican candidate) prompting debate over the rural-urban divide and how it had created both a distinct “rural consciousness” and “politics of resentment” in rural communities.
    These divisions have carried over to attitudes about climate change and clean energy, where rural areas are less likely to see climate change as a threat* or support action to address it* than are voters in urban and suburban areas. And yet, rural communities have long been the birthplace of rad, progressive organizing efforts, and a number of recent initiatives aim to bridge some of these divisions*, better understand the needs of rural communities, and marshal sorely-needed resources* to build civil infrastructure.*
    What are we learning? What are the implications for our climate and clean energy work? Grab some sweet tea because in this week’s alert, we are doing a deep dive into it all!

  • In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    Perceptions of scientific consensus do not predict later beliefs about the reality of climate change: A test of the gateway belief model using cross-lagged panel analysis

  • In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    At the cross of Rudy Giuliani, climate change, and the human brain

    While Rudy Giuliani’s “truth isn’t truth” comment might go down as one of the worst legal defense lines, it may include a small (probably unintentional) nugget of truth in terms of how people process political information.
    Communicating on climate change and clean energy can be a juggling act of different facts, figures, messages, and messengers. But what information is likely to stick, and why? This week’s alert reviews the social science literature on “political cognition” – i.e., how people think about politics – and examines how organizations can apply those insights when engaging supporters and external audiences.