Location: Minnesota
-
Making a Clean Energy Future an Equitable One
November 19, 2020
In this webinar, the Lab team is joined by the Regulatory Assistance Project to explore recommendations from the new report Energy Infrastructure: Sources of Inequities and Policy Solutions for Improving Community Health and Wellbeing.
In addition to the report, participants also learn from advocates across the country fighting for an equitable clean energy future. Contributing speakers shared their reflections and lessons learned from a variety of perspectives on what it takes to achieve energy equity, including how they’re financing low-income solar, how they’re growing solar through state-level policy, and how to work in strong coalition.
Contributing speakers include: Donna Brutkoski, Communications Associate, Regulatory Assistance Project; Yesenia Rivera, Director of Energy Equity and Inclusion, Solar United Neighbors; and Jacqueline Hutchinson, Vice President of Operations, People’s Community Action Corporation. -
For Members
Poll: President-elect Biden Has Mandate to Act on Climate
November 15, 2020
-
For Members
From Protests, To the Ballot Box, and Beyond: Building Indigenous Power
October 25, 2020
-
For Members
Memo: Voters Support the Thrive Agenda
September 9, 2020
-
For Members
Message Guide: 100% Minnesota Campaign
July 5, 2020
-
-
Energy Infrastructure: Sources of Inequities and Policy Solutions for Improving Community Health and Wellbeing
April 28, 2020
In a new report produced with the support of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Synapse Energy Economics, RAP and Community Action Partnership take an in-depth look at the disparate impacts of electric and natural gas infrastructure on economic, social, and health outcomes — and consider how to ensure that a clean-energy future is a more equitable future.
-
For Members
State-level message tests for clean energy during the coronavirus crisis
March 24, 2020
-
For Members
MN350 Volunteer Recruitment Canvass Program Experiment
February 20, 2020
Long-form, “deep canvass”-style door to door climate conversations may not be more effective at generating activism than a standard, more direct, canvass approach. In an experiment involving 1,449 canvass conversations with voters conducted by Minnesota 350, voters were randomly assigned to either a long-form or standard script, and then asked to sign a postcard to lawmakers and recruited for future activism. Future activism rates did not differ between those receiving the two scripts, though the standard script may have produced slightly higher postcard signature rates. Conversely, there is some evidence that volunteer canvassers preferred delivering the long-form script, which may have led to higher volunteer participation in the canvass program. (Supported by a grant from the Climate Advocacy Lab)