Audience: Rural
-
For Members
Placing “trust” in science: The urban–rural divide and Americans’ feelings of warmth toward scientists
January 17, 2023
-
-
Environmental Polling Roundup – December 23rd, 2022
December 23, 2022
This post includes climate and environment headlines, data points, and key takeaways from recent public polls – including new state-level polls in Texas and Nebraska.
-
For Members
Community Perspectives and Environmental Justice in California’s San Joaquin Valley
November 6, 2022
-
For Members
Rural Cooperative Utilities and the Inflation Reduction Act
November 1, 2022
-
For Members
Polling Memo: Findings About Rural Americans + Climate/Environment
August 15, 2022
-
For Members
Jul 20, 2022
Generate community, efficacy, and buy-in through SIMCA (Part 2)
In 2021, we kicked off a round of research project collaborations to study how climate, clean energy, and climate justice organizations can leverage the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA) to better engage and mobilize their bases. In short, SIMCA tells us that people participate in collective action when they feel that their social group is experiencing injustice because of an issue, they strongly identify with that group, and/or they feel that acting together could have an impact (that is, a sense of collective efficacy). Come see how we’ve been unpacking SIMCA and leave better understanding how to organize your key audiences and build buy-in from your supporters!
-
For Members
Generate community, efficacy, and buy-in through SIMCA (Part 2)
July 20, 2022
Learn about an evidence-backed framework to engage your key audiences and build buy-in from your supporters. In 2021, we kicked off a round of research project collaborations to study how climate advocates can leverage the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA) to better organize and mobilize their bases. SIMCA predicts that people participate in activism when they feel that their social group is experiencing injustice, when they strongly identify with that group, and/or when they feel that acting together could have an impact (that is, a sense of collective efficacy). These collaborations helped us unpack SIMCA and provided a better understanding of how and when to use this model. We found that SIMCA-informed messaging tended to perform as well as or better than existing approaches, though the specific context of each implementation was important for determining exactly how this played out. In part 2 of this report-out, we feature research done in collaboration with three climate justice organizations: Alaska Community Action on Toxics, Alianza for Progress, and Neighbor to Neighbor Massachusetts. (Also see our practical guide for integrating SIMCA into climate engagement programs and check out the projects from our SIMCA Part 1 webinar)