Resource Center
Explore our Resources
Access comprehensive resources, toolkits, and research to strengthen your climate advocacy work. Save resources, organize with personal tags, and share curated collections with your team.
-
-
Comparing peer-to-peer and programmable text messages
-
How do you inspire new civic leaders? A field experiment on the effect of mentoring
-
-
Alliance for Jobs and Clean Energy and Renew Oregon Digital Test Results
-
-
Climate Change in the American Mind: December 2018
-
-
-
“Be Worried, be VERY Worried:” Preferences for and Impacts of Negative Emotional Climate Change Communication
-
Does talking to people about climate change make any difference?
-
Case Study: Conservation Minnesota Accountability & GOTV Test
Highlighting the positive voting records of environmentally-friendly legislators may be an effective strategy for solidifying support for them. But don’t expect such “accountability” messages to boost election turnout; and conversely, don’t expect get-out-the-vote (GOTV) messages to change views of legislators. In a test of mail pieces to inconsistent Minnesota voters supportive of action on climate change, GOTV mail boosted turnout, and accountability mail (highlighting the voting record of elected legislators on several conservation issues) affected views of legislators and the legislature, but not visa versa. The accountability mailers did not appear to increase turnout. And the GOTV mail did not have persuasive effects