If you’re logging in to the new site for the first time, you need to reset your password.

Resource Type: Field Research

  • For Members

    In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    Leveraging Social Norms for Public Bipartisan Climate Policy Support

    May 8, 2020

  • For Members

    In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    Agency and Volunteer Engagement

    May 7, 2020

  • For Members

    In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    Contact Rates During COVID-19

    May 6, 2020

  • For Members

    In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    Can citizen pressure influence politicians’ communication about climate change?

    May 5, 2020

  • For Members

    In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    Ohio Online Training: Tactics to build power and scale for climate action in Ohio

    March 24, 2020

  • For Members

    In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    State-level message tests for clean energy during the coronavirus crisis

    March 24, 2020

  • For Members

    In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    2020 Digital Strategy Deep-Dive Workshop, Washington, D.C.

    February 26, 2020

    The Lab’s Digital Strategy Deep-Dive workshop is a 1-day immersive experience to help digital folk work through everything from defining your digital goals to measurement and evaluation of digital programs.

  • For Members

    In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    Evidence for Impact: 2020 Evidence-based Campaign Planning Workshop, Washington, D.C.

    February 26, 2020

    The Lab’s signature evidence-based campaign planning workshop, this two-day event covered key campaign planning modules. Slide decks from both Day 1 & Day 2 are available, along with the Lab’s training manual.

  • For Members

    In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    MN350 Volunteer Recruitment Canvass Program Experiment

    February 20, 2020

    Long-form, “deep canvass”-style door to door climate conversations may not be more effective at generating activism than a standard, more direct, canvass approach.  In an experiment involving 1,449 canvass conversations with voters conducted by Minnesota 350, voters were randomly assigned to either a long-form or standard script, and then asked to sign a postcard to lawmakers and recruited for future activism. Future activism rates did not differ between those receiving the two scripts, though the standard script may have produced slightly higher postcard signature rates. Conversely, there is some evidence that volunteer canvassers preferred delivering the long-form script, which may have led to higher volunteer participation in the canvass program. (Supported by a grant from the Climate Advocacy Lab)             

  • For Members

    In order to save this resource, you must be logged in.

    Log In

    Case Study: Testing how to engage the grassroots for climate action

    February 17, 2020