Resource Center

This post includes climate and environment headlines, data points, and key takeaways from recent public polls – including new national and international polling on climate action, climate impacts, and clean energy.

Awareness of climate-induced migration may increase certain “pro-social” responses but not others. Belief in climate-induced immigration seems related to greater climate change concerns and support for climate policies. However, one new study showed that reading about climate-induced migration may cause greater hostility toward immigrants. This article argues that more research is needed to determine how to foster support on climate action while minimizing backlash against immigrants.

Voters in rural-heavy counties in Georgia and Ohio tilt toward supporting wind and solar farms, but attitudes are quite malleable. Inoculation against character concerns is hard, so it may be better to focus proactive messaging on the benefits of wind and solar farms. A plurality of voters start out supporting wind and solar farms in their community but fewer than half of voters have intense attitudes either way and one-quarter are completely neutral. While voters intuitively get the pollution reduction benefits of these farms, they are more skeptical of the benefits to themselves and farmers – and they are concerned about their ROI. Encouragingly, our messaging is effective at increasing the belief that wind and solar farms will provide benefits to farmers and families – and that they create enough energy to be worth it. However, efforts to inoculate people against concerns about the impact on community character in this research were unsuccessful. Opposition attacks have a real impact, but simple pushback that ties this disinformation to Big Oil and Coal CEOs is quite successful in defusing these attacks. Positive messaging is effective at building support, especially with Democrats, less conservative Republicans, and women.