Resource Type: Field Research
-
For Members
Designing Effective, Data-Driven Climate Campaigns: How Strategic Campaigns Use YPCCC Data & Tools
January 13, 2021
YPCCC’s Partnerships Program grows the capacity of the climate movement to conduct strategic communication campaigns and transformational organizing. Over the years, organizations (both big and small) across the climate movement have used our tools and advice to develop effective tactics and winning strategies. This webinar highlighted some of these case studies and explored the major lessons learned for strategic decision making, message testing, recruitment, and advocacy. Through an interactive break-out session, they explored how our tools and data can best serve your specific organizational and campaign goals.
-
-
For Members
Case Study: How Organizations Use YPCCC Research To Develop Winning Strategies
January 6, 2021
-
For Members
Case Study: How Organizations Use YPCCC’s Research Insights, Microtargeting Models, and Message Testing to Develop Successful Campaign Communication
January 6, 2021
-
Building Structure Shapes: What Structure Reveals About Strategy from Six Movement Organizations in Transition
December 31, 2020
When faced with challenges to their power, social movement organizations can revise their structure in different ways to solve different problems. For example, the Sunrise Movement has engaged its membership in an attempt to decentralize some power from its national staff to local hubs. Color Of Change expanded its staff-driven approach to create events and local groups for social engagement and localized projects, in addition to refocusing its campaign goals to local elections. United for Respect has experienced member and staff growth, experimenting by organizing staff by campaign and by role, settling on a hybrid structure, utilizing both. Other organizations—ISAIAH, New York Working Families Party, and Florida’s Statewide Alignment Group—have also re-structured in illuminating ways. This report employs useful metaphors to describe different group structures, including “boat”, “big tent”, “Rubik’s Cube”, “house”, “stool”, and “fractal”.
-
For Members
How to Defeat Trump and Heal America: Deep Canvassing and Political Persuasion in the 2020 Presidential Election
December 31, 2020
-
For Members
Social Identification in Collective Climate Activism: Predicting Participation in the Environmental Movement, Extinction Rebellion
December 31, 2020
-
Resilience Before Disaster: The Need to Build Equitable, Community-Driven Social Infrastructure
December 21, 2020
California and the US are increasingly beset by climate-fueled disasters like wildfires, extreme heat, and power blackouts. These events put additional stress on frayed hard and social infrastructure systems, and disproportionately impact working-class communities of color. To adapt to these changes, society must update our notion of disaster response to increase resilience in these systems before disasters strike. This report offers two models for this response: 1) building and normalizing resilience hubs where community members gather and organize both in good times and bad, and 2) increasing in-home resilience by recognizing homecare workers as effective agents for assisting vulnerable populations and bridging authorities and the frontlines. The report goes on to recommend specific ways to set up resilience hubs, train care workers, and develop forward-thinking emergency response plans to avert human disasters after natural disasters.
-
For Members
Climate Communications and The Fight to Break Through
December 9, 2020
-
For Members
If We Build It, Only Some Will Come: An Experimental Study of Mobilization for Seattle’s Democracy Voucher Program
December 8, 2020
In an effort to address political inequality and encourage greater election participation, Seattle, Washington enacted an innovative democracy voucher program to provide each registered voter four $25 vouchers each election cycle to contribute towards local candidates. A field experiment in 2017 examined the effects of outreach to underrepresented communities to encourage participation in the voucher program. The experiment found that outreach increased the use of vouchers, particularly among high-propensity voters; however, deeper organizingmay be needed to reach the voucher program’s redistributive goals.
-
For Members
Why Do Practitioners Want to Connect with Researchers? Evidence from a Field Experiment
December 3, 2020
-
For Members
The ISAIAH Trash Referendum
November 30, 2020