Resource Type: Social Science Research
-
For Members
Issue linkage and climate votes in the U.S. House of Representatives, 2007–2020
September 25, 2024
-
For Members
“Farming the sun” or “coal legacy”? Social perspectives on solar energy projects in Appalachia
September 4, 2024
-
For Members
Reflections on Two Years of the IRA – August 2024
August 29, 2024
With the IRA’s 2nd anniversary, we’ve seen the positive ripples of the IRA spread across the nation. The Climate Jobs National Resource Center announced that over 6,200 IRA-eligible clean energy projects are planned, in development or already complete. CJNRC estimates the sum of all projects across the country will create over 3 million jobs that can boost pay and job quality by meeting IRA labor provisions, and generate over 1 million megawatts of clean power.
-
For Members
Climate policies that achieved major emission reductions: Global evidence from two decades
August 23, 2024
-
For Members
Data-Driven Strategies to Find and Activate Climate Voters
August 21, 2024
-
For Members
Advancing Global Social Change: Systems Approaches to the Role of Nonprofits in Climate Policy
August 20, 2024
-
For Members
Evidence-Based Recommendations for GOTV Program Planning
August 15, 2024
The Analyst Institute’s Get-out-the-Vote (GOTV) training offered a comprehensive overview of the most recent evidence to support your program decision-making, including on messaging, mode (and layering modes!), timing, and volume, along with tips for navigating a changing vote-by-mail landscape. The Lab also provided GOTV guidance specific for climate advocates.
-
For Members
Should we change the term we use for “climate change”? Evidence from a national U.S. terminology experiment
August 12, 2024
Stick with familiar terms when messaging about climate change. Overall, this research found that “climate change” and “global warming” were rated as most familiar and most concerning, and “climate justice” the least, with ratings for “climate crisis” and “climate emergency” falling in between. Moreover, this research finds no evidence for “climate crisis” or “climate emergency” eliciting more perceived urgency than “climate change” or “global warming.” Rated willingness to support climate-friendly policies and eat less red meat were less affected by presented terms, but they were lowest for “climate justice.” Although effects of terms on rated familiarity, concern, and perceived urgency varied by political leaning, “climate justice” generally received the lowest ratings on these variables among Democrats, Republicans, and Independent/others. Further analyses found that when terms were unfamiliar, participants were generally less likely to express concern, urgency, policy support, or willingness to eat less red meat.
-
For Members
Community rights and energy politics in a pro-fracking Appalachian town
August 8, 2024
-
For Members
Can large language models estimate public opinion about global warming? An empirical assessment of algorithmic fidelity and bias
August 7, 2024