Resource Library
Explore our Resources
Access comprehensive resources, toolkits, and research to strengthen your climate advocacy work. Save resources, organize with personal tags, and share curated collections with your team.
-
-
Poll: The Economist/YouGov Poll
July 25, 2022
-
-
-
-
An Active Membership: An experiment to increase new activists’ engagement
July 24, 2022
When new supporters sign up to learn more about an organization, what gets them motivated to start engaging with advocacy and taking actions? Should advocates first try to create a sense of community identity, or feed new supporters’ desire for immediate action and efficacy?
Sunrise Movement wanted to explore this question through their Welcome Series, which has traditionally culminated in a “Welcome Call” where new supporters learn more about the organization and meet other people new to Sunrise. Working with the Climate Advocacy Lab and The Movement Cooperative, they compared this to a new “Anytime Action” event where new supporters get immediate training on ways to take action. -
-
Alianza and Climate Advocacy Lab Action-Taking Test
July 21, 2022
-
Environmental Polling Roundup – July 22nd, 2022
July 21, 2022
This post includes climate and environment headlines, data points, and key takeaways from recent public polls – including a new installment of Yale and George Mason’s long-running “Climate Change in the American Mind” study + new polling on voters’ relative trust in each party to handle climate change, the environment, and other major issues.
-
-
Generate community, efficacy, and buy-in through SIMCA (Part 2)
July 20, 2022
Learn about an evidence-backed framework to engage your key audiences and build buy-in from your supporters. In 2021, we kicked off a round of research project collaborations to study how climate advocates can leverage the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA) to better organize and mobilize their bases. SIMCA predicts that people participate in activism when they feel that their social group is experiencing injustice, when they strongly identify with that group, and/or when they feel that acting together could have an impact (that is, a sense of collective efficacy). These collaborations helped us unpack SIMCA and provided a better understanding of how and when to use this model. We found that SIMCA-informed messaging tended to perform as well as or better than existing approaches, though the specific context of each implementation was important for determining exactly how this played out. In part 2 of this report-out, we feature research done in collaboration with three climate justice organizations: Alaska Community Action on Toxics, Alianza for Progress, and Neighbor to Neighbor Massachusetts. (Also see our practical guide for integrating SIMCA into climate engagement programs and check out the projects from our SIMCA Part 1 webinar)
-